Feb 24, 2018

SP MEETING 24 Feb 2018

Venue: Blk 131 void deck, no slide presentation
Present: 2 Lawyers and Marketing Agent. 1 CSC member
Crowd: quite large, I estimated around 300
Atmosphere: Cordial
Heckling: Nil

I know some of you are waiting for me to give a run down on the proceedings and what we learnt today. I will do that, but not today as I am busy with family visiting.  I will do so over the next few days.

In a nutshell:
  • Owners will not have to top up the difference in the LUP.
  • The end date for Sim Lian to continue/back out of the sale: 27 APRIL 2018
  • Date of Completion 27 July 2018 (or sooner).
  • Moving out is + 6 months from completion date - so 27 Jan 2019
  • Sim Lian wants to reduce the 6 months free rental stay to 4 months. This cannot be done without 100% of owners agreeing, which will never happen, I for one disagree.
  • Sim Lian is closely monitoring the social media so we should all keep quiet. 
  • Helloooooo Sim Lian, welcome to my blog! 
  • If the sale does not go through the Buyer has 6 months from Date of Remission to get his Stamp Duty refunded ( not 6 months form Sale Date)
  • SL initially wanted to build 2500 units, now it's 2200
  • In Principle Planning Approval (OPP) is outstanding
  • SL hoping for OPP approval before 1 March; when the new DC rates come out. 
  • SPs are encouraged to pressure our local MP to nudge the authorities to speed up the Approvals.
  • MA commits to updating owners through Circulars/Notices/FB
  • Owners will go to the Lawyers Office to collect their Bank Draft (Sales Proceeds) minus all the costs, charges & deductions of the sale.
  • Lawyer will provide a breakdown of all said costs, charges & deductions.* [the subject of a future post]

Completion Date

I hope the MA does not mind me clipping this tiny bit (15 seconds only) - it pretty much says what we all wanted to hear.
Audio (15.05)



"Yes, that is our deadline. That means the latest they can, you know, delay the whole completion, is up to 27 April., and you have 3 months to complete, 6 months for rent free period."

I hope this puts to bed the confusion sown by the legal letter in Jan. The fear then was that unless Sim Lian expressly withdrew then the long stop deadline would be bypassed like the OPP deadline with or without Approvals. Honestly, they shouldn't have asterisked  the LSD, it put a question mark on it's validity.

Okay, listened to some more today: The female lawyer confirmed the MA completion date.  It may seem like I was asking the same question again and again - I was - I wanted confirmation from both MA and lawyer. I think I even got it confirmed a third time with the main Lawyer... later in the tape, will see.  I won't put it on an audio clip because she might not like that, but this is a transcript of what she said 

(50.57) Me: Can this deal stretch for 6 more months, 1 more year?
Female lawyer: Will the deal keep stretching on indefinitely? As we shared earlier the last date for Sim Lian to confirm whether or not they are proceeding with the deal is the 27th April. there is no extension beyond that. By the 27th, they have to say yes or no. 
Me: Sorry, if they say yes, then it goes on forever?
Female lawyer: If they accept the deal by the 27th April, then the completion will take 3 months from the 27th of April. 
Me: Excellent (meaning: nailed it)

Oh dear, I had to re-listen to the nonsense our CSC member had to say:- 

"I think we have forgotten some very important things. Now there is a rule in Singapore that from the Date of Purchase of any common land, the developer will have to build and sell everything within 5 years. That is a standing rule. From the date of the signing of the agreement about 6 months has passed. They will have to give you 6 months for you to move out and before that date comes there will be another 3 months delay for them to issue cheques blah blah blah blah. So you talking about more than 1 year already gone. Now Sim Lian will not drag you on, they will want to be in as much as a hurry as you. They don’t have a lot of time. They only have 3 years plus left for them to knock down everything here, rebuild and sell every unit, otherwise they will have to start paying additional charges"

-build and sell everything within 5 years: 
Wrong. They have to build within 5 years but they then have a further 2 years to sell all the units. (so 7 yrs in total), though in practice they start selling units off the plans long before the TOP. The last 2 years does not apply to local developers and even if developers have partial foreign ownership there are currently 2 loopholes they can legally utilise to avoid paying the penalties. 

From the date of the signing of the agreement: Wrong, the 5 yr clock does not start ticking until the date of STB Sales Order (see SLA Circular). It's only been 2 months, hardly time to panic yet.  3 months completion is normal in all property sales and 6 months to move out is also normal in collective sales, We have not asked nor been given the moon. All is normal.

In fact, the Objections- far from delaying the sale -  have actually bought the Buyer some precious time. Think about it: had there been no objections, then the STB would have issued the Sale Order sooner, and the Buyers PCP (5yr Project Completion Period) would have started earlier. The Approvals have nothing to do with the STB process and  would still be outstanding.

Got fed up listening
Moving on

121 comments:

  1. When all said and done, dont forget to get back refund from our estate mgmt and sinking fund. Each of us gets back a few thousands. Lousy mgmt. lousy upkeep

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I have already sent in a request to attend the next MC Meeting as an observer and to have a copy of the latest financial report. Others should attend, too. Safeguarding starts with you.

      Delete
    2. How much was in the sinking fund in last report? It shouldnt have move much

      Delete
  2. Thank you for the update. Waiting for the next part.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear blogger,you have informed SP a lot.
    Enjoy your CNY lah.

    SL monitor social medias.ha ha ..

    ReplyDelete
  4. SL wants rent free period drop to 4 months.
    This can prove SL applied OPP AFTER SP dropped objection.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Blogger said : "Sim Lian is closely monitoring the social media so we should all keep quiet. ". Hello lady, I don't think that's what MA mean, I believe what MA meant is don't challenge SL by provoking or challenging them by suggesting we go for enbloc 4 etc. It doesn't benefit us as they can walk off anytime. We need them more than they need us. We all need to be constructive in our posting. At this stage patience & supporting each other is important instead of been provocative.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For goodness sake, big bucks do not listen to little mosquitoes like ourselves. We do NOT need them more than they need us. We can go for Rd 4, land is scarce and getting scarcer by the day.

      Delete
    2. there is no need to comment and no need to particularly not comment. We are at the end and its just a few steps away now. Whether its walk or run, we will get there.

      Delete
    3. It's about sales psychology. Smart seller would not show their arrogance or desperation while dealing is in progress. If we have to go to round 4, so be it. In the meantime you gain nothing by been arrogant.

      Delete
  6. Seems positive thanks Blogger. Any details why PP is not yet delivered? Because it was supposed to be automatic after LTA is ok?

    ReplyDelete
  7. If need to pressure our MP then got to do it now cos 1 march is 3 working days away??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apparently, at 4pm today under Blk 120, there's a CNY Neighbourhood Committee celebration with the MP. Who knew!
      I gave it a miss :)

      Delete
    2. SL has more firepower than 560 SP pleading to MP. After all, after 2 years, this would be forgotten.

      Delete
  8. Looks like everyone is monitoring on outcome of TC Enbloc?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are also monitoring the noise in this blog. Give very bad impression to TC because the noise makers can say anything they want and even make serious allegations on SPs and the team under anonymity.

      Delete
  9. Why would LTA want to give approval before 1st March? Got more money to earn for government on 1st March leh.... 😂 easy money. No one in the right mind will give approval before 1st.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dear Blogger, you questioned the amounts we shall collect instead of questioning other matters, does it mean you are confident that the sale will go through eventually? Today a resident raised a question, that's if SL won't be able to obtain PP b4 27th April, will the sale still go on? MA lady said yes. I don't think she really understood the question. If SL does not obtain PP, then he cannot move on with the sale, so the deal is aborted. Correct me if wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the money aspect is the next important thing. Others asked questions about the timing etc. The lady lawyer said that? I will go through my audio recording soon and will confirm said statement. Give me time, please.

      Delete
    2. I think (just my opinion) what the MA lady meant is if sales is aborted, SL may be still interested, maybe participating in new tender or private treaty sales? Anyway the sound system is bad & question can be misunderstood or answer misinterpreted. You should have speak up to seek clarifications. It is also strange that the blogger didn't heard what was asked and replied since she is right in front.

      Delete
    3. If the sale is aborted that is the end of rd 3. There can be no further tender or private treaty - the SCS can only enter onto a private treaty within 10 weeks of the close of tender. I sat in front so my taping would be clearer (hopefully), though I haven't listened to it yet. The Lawyer pretty much nailed his reputation on the 27th April as being the end date and if the sale continues then the 27 July will be the date of completion (or earlier). That was what I understood from all the questions and confusion. Will listen again and see of I missed anything.

      Delete
    4. Blogger, you misunderstood me. I am referring to round 4 tender or private treaty sales which SL may be interested to participate when round 3 is aborted. That's my understanding of the lady's reply. Anyway we shouldn't jump the gun. Just wait for the result of round 3. Don't get stress unnecessariy over a reply which is interpreted differently by different people.

      Delete
  11. Blogger says: "We do NOT need them more than they need us. We can go for Rd 4, land is scarce and getting scarcer by the day"

    Blogger, please note that that is your personal preference and is not representative of most of us, if not all, who attended the meeting today. I believe most of us want this round to go though.

    Your blog is not the voices of the majority SPs or official TC blog but what you state in yr blog does has an impact on the enbloc as the public including SL can read it ! So stop been so arrogant and think that you can say what you want, without consideration for others even though you own the blog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. if SL make business decision based on this blog and FB,i am more than happy SL has been delisted from main board.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous 11- How ironic. Your comment is clearly baseless and highly self presumptuous, and yet you criticize the blogger for being arrogant. Please examine your own poor character first before judging others.

      Delete
  12. 7.THEN,meeting shld be done on first week of MAR,not last week,to inform SP.

    ReplyDelete
  13. which clause in ASP stipulate 27.4.2018?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have to work it out - I did and came close with 20 April (with extension) That's because i started at the sale date (though I knew it was likely to be a few days later but could not verify)

      Delete
  14. This is a shame that SL asks for reducing rent free period to four months.
    This is just ignore the spirit of contract ,a corner stone of SG success .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't sweat it. SL shrewd enough to know it's impossible all 560 will agree. After being plummeled black and blue, it's SL way of offering TC a token, psychological victory. That's all to it.

      Delete
  15. can SL get so many approvals in two months ? re27.4.18 dead line.

    ReplyDelete
  16. appreciate blogger furnishing infor.tq

    ReplyDelete
  17. Buyer request for SP to handover within 4 months instead of 6 months to save their cost.
    In good sprit MA and lawyer also must reduce their fees for rendering their "service"

    ReplyDelete
  18. i am amazed so much noise in this blog but only few people ask questions during the actual meeting..and mind you its not a small crowd. I think this very much mirrors what is happening on the official facebook page. When you need to put your name behind your posts, you think first before you post. Here you get all sorts of people posting with all sorts of hidden agendas,..some posting fake news..e.g. 22nd Feb to be the last day to claim back BSD by SL...which i brought up during the meeting and which has since been debunked. So yes..SL may review the social media space but i think they are smart enough to discern the real facts and what is the view of the majority.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed with you fully. So much noise under anonymity but in real situations when they have to expose themselves they are as quiet as mouse.

      Delete
    2. re 18. IRAS web site does not mention six months from remission .it just says from agreement date .

      Delete
    3. have la. its 6 months from rescission of the contract.
      https://www.iras.gov.sg/irashome/Other-Taxes/Stamp-Duty-for-Property/Claiming-Refunds-Remissions-Reliefs/Remissions/Aborted-Sale-and-Purchase-Agreements/

      Delete
    4. I think blogger can set her blog to make it mandatory for people to post under an identity right?. Why get yourself implicated for allowing yr blog for people to post under anonymity and making unsubstantiated allegations and creating trouble such as posting fake news? They don't want to make defamation statement on official FB because they think it is safe do do so here. There is no such thing as IP cannot be traced even under anonymity. If anyone decided to take legal against the party, you will be implicated for nothing. Just my advice.

      Delete
    5. Only naive people will believe the noise & trouble makers are SPs from TC. They are obviously outsiders out to make our enbloc look bad.

      Delete
    6. If name is required for this blog, it will be as quiet as the FB Page. We have to be cautious and not just jump to conclusions concerning fake news.

      Delete
    7. stamp duty refund 6 months from agreement is official data.


      do not discredit this blog with fake news.

      IRAS give different info.
      6 months from agreement date or rescission date?
      HOW?

      QUOTE.
      https://www.iras.gov.sg/irashome/Other-Taxes/Stamp-Duty-for-Shares/Claiming-Refunds-Remissions-Reliefs/How-to-Claim-Refunds/

      How to Claim Refunds
      Refund claims must be made online within 6 months from the date of stamping for unexecuted document or date of document for an executed document.




      Delete
  19. I believe we will have 100% clarity with respect to DC by 1 Mar
    By thenwe should havd indication of clearance of all conditions. And the S& P kicks off....

    ReplyDelete
  20. We're very close to the end of this horrendously long journey. Once the switch is flipped, we get our money and go our own ways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kindly do not count from ASP to OPP application ,a 4 months n one week rabbit sleeping period .

      Delete
  21. if DC goes up,how about LUP ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Already mentioned that SPs dont top up LUP. This is a business cost for SL. All their projects face this.

      Delete
  22. 2000 or 2200 units? who did tell the fake news?
    either SL,government insiders or reporter.
    i think SL told reporter 2000 units.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Confirm over 2000 units?
    http://www.asiabuilders.com.sg/news/155085/sim-lian-plans-over-2-000-units-at-tampines-site

    ReplyDelete
  24. hi blogger,after CNY when u free,pl tell us if SL continue after 27 apr.,
    does SL confirm to buy ,no matter what,or just continue applying ?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Blogger said " Sim Lian wants to reduce the 6 months free rental stay to 4 months. This cannot be done without 100% of owners agreeing, which will never happen, I for one disagree. "

    I am not saying that we should agree to the reduce free rental say but personally I would rather get the $50k retention money and move out as soon as I can. Can't imagine the pathetic state of TC with all the discarded furniture, rats and crocoches, lack of maintenance & security. I am sure the bulldozer won't wait for everyone to move our before they come in. Better to enjoy my new home than hang on to TC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 4 months too short.one month house hunting,three months completion.

      renovation?
      moving?

      Delete
    2. I think blogger will be the 1st one to move out. I guess she has been viewing hundreds of home by now.

      Delete
    3. Ha! No way. I gave up looking at properties as I will definitely have to wait it out until July before joining the hunt. Unless you are buying HDB, a private property sale completes in 3 mths. So 1-2 months to find a home if you are lucky and not too picky. 3 months to complete and 1 month to do minor renovation. So, it is impossible to shorten to 4 mths I'll probably be here with the cockroaches, rats & mosquitoes until Christmas at least. Sigh

      Delete
    4. re 25.Do you rent or buy new home? How soon is soon?
      can you pl think before you type.

      I think you most likely buying. How can you move out in 4 months?
      Can u pl enlighten us.

      Delete
    5. Completion for private properties are 10-12 weeks, You can actually get bridging loan to cover the period while waiting for money to come in. In the meantime you can start house hunting now.

      Delete
  26. re 18.5. which are fake news appearing here?

    FB is sleeping.. therefore this blog provide some news n insights.
    If MA,lawyer have done enough,no one come here.

    ReplyDelete
  27. reading this blog is more informative .SP can gauge the come n prepare for future.
    FB readers,just complain,plead for info or praise .....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed fully. I have been reading both FB and blog. To me, the sales team has not been doing a good job. Any news given were second hand news. Why some suck up to the team, I don't know nor do I want to know. It's their prerogative. At least the blog gave SPs avenue to air their grievances. Why care about fake news? It is not mandatory for us to accept whatever we read. The blogger has already stated her stand in the viability of the news. If anyone is not happy just keep away from her blog. If you want to read the news, just be prepared.

      Delete
  28. Agree fully and I don't think many will stay till Jan 2019 unless truly necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  29. re rent free period reduction.
    SL will look like a gentleman by offering additional $ 10,000 to each unit .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. u think TC rental is $5K per month? please lah.

      Delete
    2. re 29.1. not related to rent. i jus hope SL can share the saving in interest and【B】 the interest it earns from the capital two months.
      i estimate 5% pa interest on loan 500 mil and 2% pa earn on capital 500 mil respectively.

      BOSS of SL,pl take note no free lunch.

      Delete
    3. Hahaa, it doesnt always work that way. Your calculation only benefits one side. Not the buyer

      Delete
  30. let us see again how efficiency of Oxley,LIAN BENG Group and buddies.
    Two enbloc were purchased in late May and late July.
    But in mid Nov,they can announce the detail.
    I suspect OPP were obtained.
    QUOTE,
    1,472 dwelling units for Rio Casa and 1,052 dwelling units for Serangoon Ville, w

    2. In Dec,they announce the full composition of each project,childcare center,number of floors etc.
    3. WHY? because they have NOT wasted the first few months after ASP.

    http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/AMDA-10EM7F/5945752189x0x964622/9DEF3840-0A2F-44FA-ABEC-18EB0887D2E9/Enbloc.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous26 February, 2018
      I think blogger will be the 1st one to move out. I guess she has been viewing hundreds of home by now.

      Reply: I agree. Thought she found a 1700sf freehiod apartment in the east with big balcony to plant her herbs ?

      Delete
    2. 4 months too short.one month house hunting,three months completion.

      renovation?
      moving?

      Reply: you don't have to wait till money come in to start looking for house. You can start now. By the time money comes in 4 mths enough for everything. If you wait too long, prices your replacement home will go up.

      Delete
    3. I did? wow, that was clever of me since I have only looked at one place way back in Oct last year and that was nice but too small and expensive. Where is this 1700sf apartment in the east with a big balcony I supposedly found? Is it near an MRT and shops and is it FH? I will only buy FH. Do tell.

      Delete
  31. That is good research. Pity SL already delisted or would have done the announcement to shareholders

    ReplyDelete
  32. Can I clarify, can SL still rescind from sale by April? Whether by Lup clause etc

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe they can, since they 'reserved their right' but let me listen to the rest of my audio and nail a few more things down first - it's just taking me some time. It's the Lawyers words that will hold the most sway.

      Delete
    2. Thanks blogger for the reply

      Delete
  33. Blogger said : "I hope this puts to bed the confusion sown by the legal letter in Jan."

    REPLY : What so confusing about the letter. ? Only you and your followers are confused. The rest of the SPs are clear about it : Apr 27 2018 is the deadline. Period !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every utterance from our team has to be parsed. So far, we've had 3 months from Sale Date, 3 months from SLA Date, 3 months from STB Sales Order, 3 months from Approvals. Perhaps some people haven't noticed the shifting ground, or unfortunately placed asterisks and are unperturbed by 'remains in force' even after long stop date. Perhaps you are also not concerned about the completion date being almost 1 year after the sales date.

      Delete
    2. Of course all SPs are concerned about completion date being almost 1 year from sales date. But what to do? If not for those insensible objectors, we would have been much better off now.

      Delete
    3. The key word is 'remains in force'. Wonder why the blogger didn't ask the lawyer during the meeting to explain the meaning of it instead of going round the bush. Many times correct answer will be given if the correct question is asked instead of trying to guess the meaning if it which give rise to misinterpretation & paranoid.

      Delete
    4. anon 33. the SPs are ONLY NOW clear because we were finally given a meeting that we kept asking for so that we could ask questions and get answers. Prior to that, as evident on FB and this blog, many residents had questions. So, you go take a chill pill, sip some tea, calm down, sit in a corner and untangle the knots and twists in your knickers that is getting you all riled up.

      Delete
    5. Whats the matter with you? it doesnt take a legally trained person to be completely uncomfortable with the Eldan Letter. If you’re comfortable then so be it. There are others who are more careful than you and want clarity. Dont assume you are the only voice around here unless you want to come out and underwrite this whole estate’s enbloc success.

      Thanks to the blogger for this recording.

      Delete
    6. Re 33.3 " remains in force. I wonder why the blogger didn't ask at the meeting.."

      Actually, I did start to ask that, but he had just stated on record (audio clip) that the completion date was 27 April, so I changed my mind mid-way as I thought it was probably moot.

      Audio: (15.33) Me: So when you said earlier in some letter that it was still in force…… ok I’ll take you at your word, thank you.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous 33.2: Why blame the objectors? They have every right to object as much as you have willing the sale to go through. Many have "wasted" time - those dragging their fee to sign the CSA, the inexperienced MA and Lawyers....
      The buyer has also"wasted" the first few months after ASP, right? If they wait until Sale Order to start moving applications with the authorities, then that is their problem, not the objectors' fault, yes?

      Delete
    8. re 33.2. Why dont you blame SL applied OPP in Dec 2017?
      If SL apply before mid Nov 2017,TC may escape PAFS which resulting in TC
      lower number of units to be built.

      Delete
    9. 33.6 blogger,you are too lenient in this issue at that particular moment .
      May be you avoid confrontation.

      (continues to be in force)in the letter is killing...

      Delete
  34. I am not involved in this Tampines Court enbloc. I read both the FB page and the private blog as it was very interesting. I won't want to take sides on this issue of deadline. I don't know what was written in the lawyer's letter but from the conversations I reckoned that there was an asterisk clause to say that the Purchase Agreement will still be in force after the deadline if the buyer does not rescind the contract. With my experience, the deadline is 27 April as indicated but I believe the buyer put in this clause to keep the agreement ongoing so that he can get back his deposits as he needs the 6 months timing to get the authorities to sanction the cancellation of the agreement. Without the clause, he may lose his deposits which will amount to almost 40 million dollars.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. no wander SL also put a rescission clause in Jan 2018 ..

      Delete
  35. 33.1.
    Florence Regency completion date is 3 mon from sale order or OPP,whichever is later. so clear cut.

    do they hv buyer one sided rescission clause,Dear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 33.4 & 33.5 : You have no right to ask me to shut up ! Do you owe the blog ? If you cannot accept others opinions then you should be the one who should leave the blog !

      To the blogger: Thks for confirming that you did ask, perhaps I didn't hear it. Based on your recording playback, it seems to me it is quite clear: " ... there is NO extension beyond that, By the 27th April, they have to say yes or no "

      Perhaps you may want to post the question on the official FB to ask what is the definite legal implication of the word: " remain in force ". Are we bound in any way after 27th April or can we just walk off and start enbloc 4 ?

      To anyone who want to whack me because of my contribution (even though you are not happy with what I say), sorry you can't stop me. So long as the blog is still open, I will be here ! So live with it please !

      Delete
    2. I am not going to hammer on about this any more. They were pretty clear about it yesterday. 1) If on or before 27 April Sim Lian rescind then the deal is dead. Hello Rd 4
      2) If on 27 April, Sim Lian has not rescinded the deal is on and completion is 3 months.
      3) If the Approvals come in earlier than 27 April, then the completion process can begin earlier.

      Delete
    3. Re 35.1.how many question in FB has been answered with satisfactory ansewer?

      Delete
  36. re blogger female lawyer answer.
    but the Jan lawyer letter,i quote.


    The Long stop date.....
    Failing such rescission,the SPA continues to be in force.UNQUOTE

    So,does this refer to Apr 27 dead line ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Long Stop date (incl. 1 mth extension), is 27 April, if that is your question.

      Delete
  37. Unless and until SP lawyer gives in writing to explain *Continues to be in force*
    SP must assume your hands are both tied,until SL show her mercy to release u from the deal.
    Good luck.u need more than u think.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Hi blogger i wonder whether u go to the fish market every morning to record what the fishmongers tell u..."u said the fish is fresh!..i recorded what u said, if later i discover the fish not fresh,..i will use the recording against u!" "i am going to post the recording on my blog for the whole singapore to hear!" Unless explicitly agreed to by the person, u cannot just suka suka post people's audio all over social media. pls respect other people's privacy and confidentiality. you are more kiasu and kiasi than your average singaporean. the dates have already been conveyed loud and clear during the meetings, i dont think its appropriate to post the audio for everyone to hear. hearing some of your questions asked, i now know why u need to ask so many questions..as a matter of fact, many of your questions are very amateurish downright ignorant e.g "will we get a breakdown of the order of charges?"...this is what conveyancing lawyers are supposed to do! Finally we do things a little different here,..we dont always think we are the most clever person in the room and the rest are all idiots i.e. we keep our superior syndrome in check and approach issues in a less confrontational way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sorry to say I totally disagree with your position. Was the CSC, Lawyers and Huttons naive to believe that what they say would not be recorded? Its only a small part which is online. Further, was there a confidentiality agreement signed like there was in the tender opening?

      In fact, it is people like you who gaze over the most important points that are susceptible to being hoodwinked by sleight of hand. That the CSC Chair has made clearly wrong statements such as when the timing of the 5 years starts, it is crystal clear he doesn't know what he was talking about. Recordings like these will only make him more aware of how important it is for him to say only things that he is sure of. We have enough asterisks leading to nowhere.

      Delete
    2. There is nothing offensive about the tiny audio clip, it's for everyone who was not there to hear exactly the confirmation we all need. It wasn't private or confidential and will hopefully put people at ease . He spoke well and unambiguously. If he is upset by the 15s clip I will remove it. But honestly, it is fine. I have no intention of posting any other audio clip.
      You sound very sour. I am sorry if you found my questions ignorant, how did you find other people's questions? Did the guy who asked 'What is LUP?" irritate you, too? Or are you just one of the usual crabby hecklers who can't stand me but kept quiet on the day?

      My 'order of charges' question was a throw back to Rd 1 when I discovered HUDCs Phase III/IV were treated differently from all other properties . In 2002, the Gov changed the order from CPF first to 2nd charge for all properties.... except Tampines Court and a handful of other HUDCs whose order was quietly reversed as far back as 1996 or even earlier. The order has no effect on me, my mortgage is fully paid and I am debt free, but who knows, there may be owners out there with very complex financial situations and if banks/CPF/Others sweep in and make their deductions first, then it is theoretically possible for someone to be left with a shortfall.

      I also have never sold a private property before and if that makes me ignorant then so be it. In a sale this huge, small amounts can be lost & discrepancies easily discounted by owners. What's a few dollars, or even a few hundred dollars when you are getting $1.7m .. but it can add up to significant sums collectively - and it goes somewhere.
      I have no experience of a conveyance lawyer's breakdown, but I expect it to be detailed, down to the last penny. Many will not check, but I will.

      Ps. I had the phone in my hand, clear as day, held up to catch the clearest sound.

      Delete
    3. anonymous 38- The analogy you used is woefully half-witted. The stakes in your "example" in no way compares to the stakes involved in this en bloc transaction. I hardly think that privacy and confidentiality is even relevant here at this point. Perhaps the blogger's questions may be "amateurish", but at least they were relevant. I highly doubt you even have the ability and knowledge to ask any questions at all during the meeting.

      Delete
  39. re 38.SP were treated too badly since ASP signed.Therefore,blogger adopt a unusual way to keep evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Right. I don't think there is any problem taping down. Tks for blogger's hard work. I find more protected.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Anonymous27 February, 2018
    Re 35.1.how many question in FB has been answered with satisfactory ansewer?

    REPLY: What makes you think your questions will be answered satisfactory and legally correct here ? Read the blogger's disclaimer clause. Also what makes you think the team is oblige to come here to answer your question when it is not even an official TC blog?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FB DID NOT tell u true color of LUP clause,and SL one side only rescission clauses(jan n april )etc.

      Delete
  42. Anonymous27 February, 2018
    Further, was there a confidentiality agreement signed like there was in the tender opening?

    REPLY: The agreement is implied because the meeting is exclusively only for TC SPs and anything discussed should be private and confidential and not make public as in this blog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nonsense, there was nothing confidential or private about matters discussed. The notice of meeting was distributed to the wind and the void deck is hardly a private place when even strangers/visitors/tenants can hear what was said. Any Tom, Dick or Harry could have joined in. We were not required to give our names and unit numbers before asking questions.

      The meeting was held to help owners understand exactly where we are, and it did just that. Many owners did not/could not attend.

      Delete
    2. Of course we can't stop strangers from coming into TC or listening to the meeting. But still TC is a private property and trespassers will be prosecuted. By making what is deemed to be private discussion for the SPs in your blog, I believe you are breaching the confidentiality of TC SP's private matters.

      Delete
    3. Hi blogger. TC is a private estate. When you say any tom dick or harry could have joined the meeting..are u then implying that our security is not doing their job by allowing any tom dick and harry into the estate without a stated purpose?..

      Delete
    4. good.count me in next meeting.i will wear a green cap.

      Delete
    5. anonymous 42.3- You can never be too sure. Security might be doing somewhat of a job, but there is always a possibility of troublemakers slipping through using some form of deceit.

      Delete
    6. Anyone one can in by taxi. Taxies are never stopped.

      Delete
  43. As an observer many Enbloc sales have gone well or smooth sailing with successfulBuyer-Seller on a win win formula. Sad to say TC situation is full of dramas & hope to be successful.Many competitors like Ivory Height, Tulip Gardens, etc. are all in the limelight.So developers are spoilt for choice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes! There arent dramas in Pine Grove, Ivory Heights and any of the enblocs out there. They all go off for sale and successful tenders with buyer and seller convinced they got the better deal.

      Innocent like a baby.

      Delete
  44. " if banks/CPF/Others sweep in and make their deductions first, then it is theoretically possible for someone to be left with a shortfall. "

    REPLY: Yes, CPF will have the first charge. You need to pay back the amount of loan you took for your mortgage plus acrued interest. After they deduct the minimum retirement sum, the rest they will bank into your bank account. So do your financial planning before committing in another home. If not later got problem blame the team again. Why didn't inform you blah, blah, blah.... You don't know how to do your own due diligence meh ?, just like the objectors never do their homework before objecting. Wasting everyone's time !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Way back in 2008, an owner took his collective sale (Waterfront View) to High Court as the bank took first charge and there wasn't enough money left to pay back his CPF principle & accrued interest - a shortfall. The Court ruled that the CPF can waive the outstanding amount and the sale went through. It did not go to Court of Appeal where I felt it could have been reversed. How can the CPF not be protected? it is our savings. But hey, that CPF waive rule stands to this day until it is challenged all the way to Appeal.

      I will do my own due diligence for sure, but this blog isn't about just me, it's about the process in general. If I am wasting your time, you are just a mouse click away from more productive websites...(meh).

      Delete
    2. You are taking a historical case and applying to today's context when the laws of enbloc has since been revised extensively. this is ridiculous. the role of the STB is to hear financial hardship case. if there is even a single case of shortfall after the sale, u can be rest assured the enbloc WILL NOT GO THROUGH! STB will not allow it. The fact there is none means NO SHORTFALL. so why bring the issue of shortfall and start calculating for everyone?! u are injecting non issues here and complicating things and wasting everyone's time. much like the 3 objectors. things are already complicated as it stands, we dont need self professed heroes or heroines to save the earth.

      Delete
    3. A historical case that ended in a HIGH COURT RULING which is binding on all collective sales from that point on. I have not heard of any High Court/Court of Appeal Ruling that has reversed that decision. Have you?
      Financial Loss and Shortfalls are NOT the same.
      The STB cannot approve a sale if there is Financial Loss. The LTSA does not cover Shortfalls - it's tough luck owners on that score.

      Delete
    4. No wonder people call u ignorant. both are actually both sides of the same coin. shortfalls and financial loss in the context of enbloc are the same. end of the day, if what they give u cannot cover what u paid for (regardless use CPF, loan or cash), there is no sale. the rest will have to top up the loss if still want sale to proceed. u can call it shortfall or financial loss..does it matter?. in tc context, no one falls into that category...everyone has profit to report..so why bring this irrelevant point up during the meeting? for what? just to show how caring and smart u are?...caring for who?

      Delete
  45. What Happens to your money when you sell your flat in Singapore? Good Tips:
    https://dollarsandsense.sg/happens-money-sell-flat-singapore/

    ReplyDelete
  46. " If I am wasting your time, you are just a mouse click away from more productive websites...(meh). "

    REPLY : As I said, so long as your blog is open, I and & anyone else will be here. You can either block us or don't upload our posts if you only want your silly followers to sing praise to you. But we will continue to spam your blog with our rebuttal or replies in the same way you & your faceless anonymous continue to attack the team.. You can't do anything about it, can you ? So Live with it !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 46- Of course no one can stop u from spamming this blog. Clearly you find delight in such juvenile behaviour. Do continue making a fool of yourself. You make such a great target for mockery and ridicule.

      Delete
  47. I believe there are many (some SPs and some implanted characters) who have been sucking up to the team and telling others not to go into this blog while they themselves secretly checking the blog and demeaning the lady blogger. To me, she has done a good job to provide other SPs info on the enbloc. She may be critical at times but who will not be with such a team. I hope she will continue with her blog until this enbloc comes to the end. With such inactivity in the FB Page, we need an alternative site to voice our comments or frustrations.

    ReplyDelete
  48. For the pro service providers pls rethink what sorts of information can they tell us?
    They are only keen when they are after Sps to sign the csa.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Dear TC SPs,
    Please don't waste the energy and time on wrong direction now,
    if you're wasting more time, the end dated (27-Apr-2018) is closer to you...
    Remember the agenda of 24-Feb-2018 meeting is Developer/MA/Lawyer/SPs all of us wanted TC enbloc to go through, but we have to works together.
    So please think about how can SPs to voice up (as much as you can in any where) to help on clearing the roadblocks in front as soon as we can, the Developer/MA/Lawyer/SPs will appreciate to you. (as a citizen, you have the right to voice up your request, don't underestimate your power)
    always remember the meaning of this meeting, we still have a chance to success this enbloc if the team power works in same direction.....
    thank you...

    ReplyDelete
  50. Anonymous25 February, 2018
    I believe we will have 100% clarity with respect to DC by 1 Mar

    REPLY: If CSC don't update us on FB, is that anyway we can find out ourselves?

    ReplyDelete
  51. UPDATE IS ON FB.

    ReplyDelete