If the postal date was 4 May, then the letter was not sent before the announcement of the $200k rise in RP either on 25 April (original posting on FB 25 Apr 2017 at 20:57, though this later changed to 26 April at 11:52) or on 28th Apr (18th SC Meeting).. Singpost is far more efficient than that. Possible reasons:
- The RP is still not official - perhaps it has to be ratified with a new CSA from the legal department.
- There are 2 RPS out there - one for residents and another for non-residents.
I am very sceptical about all this. Are they going ahead with signing sessions before the RP has been officially raised? The CSA signing page has no RP listed on it - so how is the SP to know which RP is is signing for?
I would demand some form of written assurance that the RP is now the higher $1.X (with added $200k) before signing any blank piece of paper.
- Are we to get any legal affirmation for the new RP?
- Why are some SPs receiving letters and others not? Selective dissemination of information is very worrying.
By this weekend signing, if we cannot achieve at least 70%,I think it's game over !
ReplyDeleteMore unconvincing explanations, unnecessary complications; symptomatic of SC/MA's (mis)management of this Collective Sale from the very beginning. Tomorrow's or any other day numbers don't really matter anymore. Enbloc foundation is so weak it will all come tumbling down like a house of cards.
DeleteMa'am you raise pertinent issues. To answer satisfactorily would require knowledge of LTSA and be familiar with proper, acceptable conduct of Collective Sale. It's out of their depth to give clear, straight answers now without their go to guy; you know, the one they expelled.
ReplyDeleteI'm not signing, so their default fallback position; taking the fifth, is fine by me. Those considering signing may demand more clarity. Or they may not. It's their prerogative, their choice, their rights and our homes.
Boy O Boy, these guys are good! They bend it better than Beckham!....and it's not about the ball.
ReplyDeleteHonesty is the best policy. If that's too bothersome, then an alibi is a good enough alternative.
ReplyDeleteI need help to track a missing letter. Who do I call in Singpost?
What's with the nitpicking and speculating? Simply ask for the CSA and you will see the RP very clearly. Of course the signing page will have a reference to what you are signing, in the presence of a lawyer. This is misleading.
ReplyDeleteYou are wrong. The last time they had a signing session I went down to check. I even took a pic of the signing page - there is NO mention of the actual RP figure you are signing for, It is a GENERIC page - just take out your old CSA and look at it. When I asked to see some form of proof - the new CSA for example - they couldn't give me any.
DeleteActually no issue lah. It's silly to deny payout of the latest RP. Enbloc apportionment is equal & based on flr size. No developer, MA or SC will try to shortchanged any SPs or cheat them by paying some SPs lesser. Asking for trouble only.
DeleteAre we talking about the same fellas who dreamed up about Silver Zone, Round market closure, too big to swallow any higher unworkable at 7XXM, not interested in FOC valuation of TC, withheld crucial info from SPs, no problem with conflict of interest, badmouth our estate, make unfair comparisons, contradict themselves on a regular basis, hold secret discussions pertaining to the sale of our estate, go on breaking the law because too lazy to read up, confused about which RP is currently in effect? Let me check. Yep, same ones. Big Deal Man!
DeleteDarn you Singpost. More than 10(TEN) days to effect delivery of a simple letter on our little island! Has SC determined if ALL non resident SP mail were affected? It's either a cruel, malicious act or gross incompetence by Singpost.
ReplyDeleteSC must investigate and lodge a complain against Singpost. They're jeopardising this Enbloc. First it's Mr V, now Singpost. What's wrong with these guys? Can't they ever get things right!
The letter to all non resident SPs is correct. It was sent before RP was aggrandised in reaction to latest GLS numbers.
DeleteNo complaint need be lodged against Singpost. Thank You.
Have SC sent another letter to non resident SPs that undated letter, postal date 4 May has been superseded with newer RP?
ReplyDeleteNow that we are done with the durian seller, anti-enblockers want to pull in the durian pickup company (Singpost) for not delivering the notice.
ReplyDeleteIn fact, anti-enblockers don't know who to blame so they will blame anyone and everyone. But not themselves of course.
Soon, I am sure the government is going to be dragged in. What fun!
Issue is the unbelievable tall tales swallowed hook, line and sinker by some. No no no not the government, but the courts.
DeleteYa lah, govt at fault also. They should give 24 mths instead of 12 mths to collect 80% signature.
DeleteAdverse comment on Singpost was made by PRO Enbloc in defence of SC. Expletive directed at delivery boy, not committee.
Delete66% have signed. Oh god please do not give them the 80% that they do not deserve
ReplyDeletePls learn to give thanks to sc, its a thankless job, if you think you can do better, why didn't you people volunteer, instead of wasting time and energy opposing.
Delete66% have signed! Looks like this will go down to the wire!
ReplyDeleteAnother 5 weeks of watching Pro-enbloc and Anti-enbloc fanboys throwing durian egg tarts at each other!
Do not sign, because of the memories you treasure at TC and hold dear.
ReplyDeleteSign, if you want to start a new life or need to put aside funds for a rainy day.
The most stupid thing to do (in my view) is to let the SC/MA be the reason for why you sign or don't sign.
Money is the king. It's the reason for those who signed if they find it attractive. Nothing to do with SC/MA.
Delete